It’s finally that sweet time of year when we step out of the house in the morning to sparkly, frost-covered grass. When the leaves start to fall in vibrant, autumn-colored hues. And when every store you enter has bags upon GLORIOUS bags of your favorite candy bars, miniature-sized for Halloween.
I usually make a beeline for the Snickers bars myself, but I know that isn’t everyone’s jam. In fact, according to a recent survey by Candystore.com, it only ranks No. 3 on the list of America’s Top 10 Favorite Candies — beat out by Skittles and M&Ms, which nabbed the No. 1 and No. 2 spots, respectively. Other noteworthy faves are Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups (yum), which came in at No. 4 and the highly controversial candy corn, which ranked No. 6.
Candystore.com also faithfully dug through 11 years worth of candy sales data to determine the most popular Halloween candies by state (because they’re clearly doing the good work over there), and let me tell you, it is riveting stuff.
Apparently, my home state of New York’s favorite candy is Sour Patch Kids. (Honestly, I will eat those things until my taste buds can’t take it anymore, but I was still surprised they nabbed the top spot.) We’re not alone, though — Maine and Massachusetts are also big fans of the sour sweets, since they came in at No. 1 there, too.
Hmmm … I guess it’s a regional thing? Northeast, baby! SPKs, REPRESENT!
Texas’ No. 1 seller on Halloween is the Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup, with over 1.1 million pounds put down last year. I repeat: Texas ate 1.1 MILLION POUNDS OF REESE’S PEANUT BUTTER CUPS FOR HALLOWEEN. (Okay, I guess that’s not super surprising, considering how insanely delicious they are.)
Meanwhile, the sunshine state of California loves tasting the rainbow, consuming some 1.6 million pounds of Skittles last year. Also not entirely surprising. Washington state appears to be rolling deep in … SALT WATER TAFFY? (What goes on, Washington state?) Even New Jersey, the actual home of salt water taffy, went with Skittles as its No. 1 fave. To each their own, I guess.
Floridians, on the other hand, seem to be most in-tune with my own taste buds, and reportedly went through over 660,000 pounds of Snickers bars last Halloween. Yum.
Regardless of your state’s personal fave, there’s no doubt that Americans are big fans of all things sweet. Candystore.com reported that over 170 million Americans celebrate each October 31st with a night of tricks and treats, with TREATS being the operative word.
Another important finding that I’d like to point out to the old lady who lives down the street from me, is that according to the survey, 95% of Americans who celebrate Halloween hand out candy from their homes. (YOU HEAR THAT, LADY IN THE BLUE HOUSE WITH THE MEAN DOG?)
The survey also found that 50% of parents who buy Halloween candy stash a little bit away in secret place for later in the year. They did not, however, mention anything about people who start buying Halloween candy in August and proceed to go through about four bags before October even rolls around. But I mean, hey … they put it in the stores. Are we not supposed to buy it?
Whatever your Halloween treat of choice is, have fun stocking up on it now — you know, while it’s still socially acceptable to buy giant bags of candy for other people, and then eat most of it yourself.
This year, my 4-year-old kid began preschool. Being a common 2nd kid , he was more than all set on his very first day, marching in with his shoulders back and head held high. He’’ s extremely brave and immensely positive for such a little man. (Don’t get me incorrect. If he was frightened, I absolutely would have hugged him up. Still, I’’ m not gon na lie: I took pride in his bold mindset.)
Most of my expectations about the very first day of school were spot-on, a minimum of when it pertained to my child’’ s disposition.’I wasn ’ t prepared for what he brought house in his knapsack that extremely night: a calendar of nighttime research.
Yes, you check out that. Nightly research for a 4-year-old.
Maybe I shouldn’’ t have actually been rather so shocked. My child had actually been provided research in kindergarten, which was constantly a lesson in perseverance. After she had actually been sitting at a desk the majority of the day, attempting to get her to take a seat yet once again and finish her research was dreadful. She’’d tear at the corners of the page and scribble in the margin. She likewise didn’’ t appear able to concentrate on in fact doing the work.
I was irritated at the time, however in retrospection, it was entirely age-appropriate habits. It was likewise my very first stint in this gimmicky, extremely scholastic type of kindergarten we’’ re seeing these days. I attempted to play by the guidelines. Recalling, nevertheless, I want I hadn’’ t. By midyear, we quit on it entirely. Her instructor even confessed to me that while she disliked offering research to such young trainees, it needed to be performed in order to stay up to date with the brand-new stiff requirements.
Even though I’’d been through the” early research “fiasco previously, research for a 4-year-old appeared a lot more unusual to me. If the research was optional, I quickly questioned. Possibly some kids that age similar to doing research and it’s given up case they desire the additional difficulty?
Sadly, that wasn’t the case. I turned the page and really saw the word ““ optional ” scratched out with a black Sharpie. My ex-husband and I shared a laugh about it. We might hardly get our kid to put on his trousers without empty risks and bribery. How would I get him to take a seat and do research? A lot more than that, why would I even wish to?
In fact, I had no objective of requiring my child to do research, no matter what the job was or whether I believed it was age-appropriate. The demand itself felt improper entirely. He currently invests complete eight-hour days at school, and I can inform he’’ s invested at the end of the day. I was likewise mad at the not-so-subtle tip that there was no stating ““ no ” to research, as kept in mind on the paper. It made me wish to toss it straight in the trash.
At the exact same time, I didn’’ t wish to disrespect the class policies. Despite the fact that I understood we wouldn’’ t be making the effort each night to finish any quantity of research, I pleasantly put the paper and his structure note pad back in his knapsack, understanding it will remain blank all year . If anybody has something to state about it, I’’ ll need to discuss that no matter what the school thinks is affordable, I do rule out research to be an efficient usage of our time. My child won’’ t be doing it.
. Image Source: Sarah Bregel.
Instead, he ’ ll be enjoying his extremely minimal downtime by playing outside with his community good friends up until supper, having a bath, and going to sleep early so that he can fulfill the currently really high requirements of his significantly scholastic preschool.
Call me insane, however I ’ m likewise not excessively interested in my kid ’ s scholastic capabilities today anyhow. I ’ m even more thinking about his psychological and psychological health, in addition to his capability to make good friends and keep marching into that class with self-confidence. Saddling him with research each night isn ’ t going to assist accomplish any of those things. I understand from experience that requiring really young kids to finish scholastic jobs they might not be all set for just makes them dislike school, rather than attain any genuine gains, scholastic or otherwise.
Allison Slater Tate, a mom of 4 in Orlando, Florida, concurs.She states she, too, pulled out of making her earliest kid to research when it was provided at the age of 4.
“ I chose not to have him do it since honestly, I protest research for kids through grade school, and it was a concern for us in the house,” states Tate.“” I had more youthful kids and he had a 7:30 bedtime. It simply was not a top priority for us. ”
On top of that, Tate states she thinks research is disadvantageous.
“ I believe research for more youthful kids eliminates their love of knowing and … provides an unfavorable association with schoolwork, ” she states.
While she might have been right on“, her kid’s instructor wasn ’ t so flexible when it concerned his transcript.
“ His absence of research conclusion was appropriately kept in mind on his transcript, which I appropriately included the garbage without a doubt, ” states Tate.
When it came time for Tate ’ s youngest to go to school, she selected a school that had a no-homework policy rather.
While research for the youngest students may be thebrand-new requirement, that doesn ’ t indicate it ’ s advantageous. Even though I think moms and dads must attempt to get on board with school policies, we are likewise moms and dads. We aren ’ t walking supporters for our kids ’ s schools. We need to promote for our own kids– and often, that suggests breaking a guideline or more. When the guideline is nighttime research for 4-year-olds, specifically.
Policy makers should consider alternatives to the exclusive use of English when devising English-taught programs, in favour of a bilingual approach that includes the students’ first language, a white paper released by Oxford University Press argues.
“It’s very easy to understand why governments and businesses want to develop English language skills in their country’s young population. English represents a way for people to engage in international politics, commerce and culture,” said Victoria Murphy, deputy director of Oxford’s department of education, one of the experts who were consulted for the paper.
“English fluency should never come at the expense of the child’s first language”
“But English fluency should never come at the expense of the child’s first language.”
What Murphy defined as a “zeal” for English education has in fact led to policies that sometimes exclude the child’s first language from the classroom.
This approach isn’t only detrimental to the first language itself. Far from being a distraction, proficiency in the first language is strongly related to proficiency in an additional language, and it supports the development of academic competences, the paper explains.
The paper argues that policies excluding the first language (L1) from the English classrooms are “based on intuitions” about how languages are learned.
Written by applied linguistics lecturer Hamish Chalmers in consultation with a panel of experts, the white paper reviews current research supporting the role of the first language for ‘multilingual learners,’ not only for the development of academic and linguistic competences, but also for their personal and cultural identity, wellbeing and engagement with the school system.
“Research has shown that students who are educated in both their L1 and English tend to learn English more effectively and do better academically than their peers who are educated in English only,” it warns.
Schools where English-medium education policies are employed range from “extremely linguistically diverse” international schools, where English acts as a lingua franca, to private schools where both pupils and teachers speak the national language and opportunities to speak English outside of the classroom are minimal.
Other instances where English is used as a medium of instruction are for example Content and Language Integrated Learning programs.
The white paper offers policy proposals to incorporate the first language in each of the various English-medium education settings, insisting that there is rarely a case for English-only education.
Yordanka Kavalova, the publisher of the paper, told The PIE News that the paper is intended to reach a variety of policy makers and decision makers.
“We shouldn’t be trying to make students into English speakers – we should be making them bilingual”
“Our local offices are working on enhancing reach through local solutions that best fit regional requirements and contexts,” she explained, adding that OUP has also published books on EMI and CLIL to support further research and influence teacher training programs. Another volume published by OUP, The Glitterlings, is a program targeted at international schools and pre-schools “with multilingualism at its heart.”
“We shouldn’t be trying to make students into English speakers – we should be making them bilingual. There are clear societal and economic benefits to being bilingual: you are more employable because employers favour bilingual over monolingual candidates,” Murphy said.
“In the European School system, pupils can have the unique opportunity to follow their mother tongue either as an individual subject or as part of a language section if it exists, and then learn other languages as a L2/3/4/5,” director of the European School Bergen Steve Lewis told The PIE.
Students then have the opportunity to study some subjects in their second language, and in the final years of high school they must study history and geography in their second language.
“As a result pupils are not only exposed to a range of languages in and out of the classroom as a result of the multi-lingual learning and social environment, but also have the cultural elements of language acquisition,” Lewis explained.
Asked whether the recommendations contained in the white paper could be applicable to the adult ELT classroom, both Murphy and Kavalova said yes, to some extent.
“Research is not yet definitive about how much time in the L1 is appropriate [in the adult classroom], but there is good evidence to suggest that judicious use of the L1 in an adult L2 classroom can be very helpful for the L2 learner and help move them along the L2 developmental trajectory,” Murphy said.
“How to do this is of course a bit trickier in a class when there are many different L1s and where the teacher is not familiar with the L1s.”
Gabrielle Union had the perfect clapback to an Instagram user who thought she was Brandy
It’s 2019, yet people of color—especially women of color—get mistaken for one another on a regular basis. The New York Times recently misidentified Angela Bassett as Omarosa, and Muslim American Noor Tagouri was confused with Pakistani actress Noor Bukhari in Vogue’s February issue. Now, Gabrielle Union is the latest person to be mistaken for someone she’s definitely not—and she handled the situation like a pro.
Yesterday, February 13th, Fenty Beauty shared a picture of Union to Instagram in honor of Black History Month. The actress also appeared in the makeup brand’s Story. Although Union was tagged in both the post and the story, one fan made an unfortunate mistake, writing “Brandy!!!! I love her.” The Being Mary Jane actress wasted no time in setting the record straight.
“girl I [heart] @4everbrandy tooooooooo!” she wrote in reply. “I, however, am Gabrielle Union Wade and I hope you are never a witness to any crime cuz your eye witness testimony is a problem.” She followed her comment with an eye-rolling emoji and several laughing face emojis to make her tone clear.
E! News notes that the original comment has been deleted, but the account @commentsbycelebs captured a screenshot of the exchange.
A post shared by b r a n d y (@4everbrandy) on Feb 11, 2019 at 7:37am PST
While the original Instagram commenter probably just made an innocent mistake, the misconception that people of color “all look alike” is insidious and pervasive. And it can have serious consequences. In 2017, a Raw Story article misidentified Noor Tagouri (the same woman who was recently misidentified by Vogue) as the Pulse Nightclub shooter’s wife—which could have endangered her and her family’s lives.
It’s 2019, and we need to get better at looking closely and fact-checking.
There are all sorts of threats that exist outside of our control. In fact, when you sit down to consider it all it can be very overwhelming. The idea of creating a threat matrix can be very helpful but it …
We haven’t heard much from Jim Acosta since he strolled the southern border and trolled himself in an epic way. Oh, we’re sure he’s continued babbling on Twitter about this or that but he doesn’t make our radar quite as much these days.
But this was just too good …
Nothing seems to trigger Jim quite as much as the idea of being called fake news, except maybe when fact checkers are called fake news.
The evil orange man called fact checkers FAKE NEWS. Fact checkers, diary. He has no shame! No shame! Why oh why must he be such a big ol’ meanie pants? And why oh why can’t I quit him? Only you truly understand me, diary.
PS: Twitchy editors are also mean ol’ poopy heads.
PPS: My hair is the strongest ever.
PPPS: I ate an entire thing of raw cookie dough, don’t judge me.
The famous vocalist, who unfortunately died in May 2017, won Best Rock Performance for his solo track “When Bad Does Good” off in 2015’s Chris Cornell box set . In a touching minute, his 2 kids — — Toni, 14, and Christopher, 13 — accepted the award in his honor and offered an exceptionally psychological speech.
” I never ever believed we ‘d be standing here without my daddy and I’m sure he ‘d be happy and honored,” Christopher stated. “He was understood for lots of things. He was a rock icon, the godfather of grunge, and the developer of a motion, whose contribution to music history made a long lasting effect throughout generations and categories.”
” He was likewise among the best poets of his time,” he continued, “whose voice, skyrocketing memorable vocals, made him the voice of a generation. While he touched the hearts of millions, most notably he is understood for to us is for being the best dad in our ear.”
” His voice was his vision and his music was his peace,” his child Toni included. “This is for you daddy and we like you a lot.”
Watch the whole approval speech listed below.
Throughout his profession, Cornell had actually been chosen for a Grammy 16 times. Tonight marks his 3rd win, following his 2 Grammys with Soundgarden in 1995 for Best Metal Performance (” Spoonman”) and Best Hard Rock Performance (” Black Hole Sun”).
Pick up Cornell’s releases on vinyl by heading to ReverbLP .
Game-changer, breakthrough, the next big thing. Here we go again…
Pick a Best of PGA Show article and you’ll find those adjectives and other superlatives in nauseating abundance. I’ve been guilty of it a few times myself. Every year hundreds…thousands of products are on display at the annual self-titled “Major of Golf Business” in Orlando. A significant percentage can be counted among the year-over-year churn of the big equipment manufacturers, but there’s also a fair (though dwindling) amount of stuff that’s new, cool, and full of promise. These can’t miss products fill the countless best of lists written each year, and invariably 9 out 10 go nowhere.
Good ideas hit snags, prototypes never make it to full-scale manufacturing, consumer don’t buy-in. After 5 minutes of industry impact, a good bit of the new hotness fizzles, dies, and disappears. At best, most become fodder for gearhead trivia. Does anybody else remember The Chicken Stick?
A Different List
This year, I’m not falling into the trap. My list is different. I’m thinking about longevity and the potential for paradigm shifts. It means I’m playing more to the mainstream. Sorry if that’s boring, but this is golf, where more often than not, the next big thing is just a fresh take on the same old thing. Embrace it, or at the very least, accept it.
The products on this list may not appear to be the most innovative, most won’t disrupt the status quo (some might), but the trade-off is the virtual certainty that the majority will still exist 6 months from now.
And so, in no particular order (other than how I wrote them down), here are my top picks from the 2019 PGA Show.
Fujikura Ventus Shaft
At $350 retail, Ventus is more expensive than most of Fujikura’s aftermarket models, and as you’d expect from any major shaft release, there’s plenty of talk about materials and technology. Case in point, the Ventus’ VeloCore, which is built from full-length, ultra-high modulus Pitch 70 ton Carbon fiber (the design also includes some 40 Ton material).
Blah blah blah, shaft stuff, I know.
To give you some semi-meaningful frame of reference, Pitch 70 is 150% stiffer than the T1100 material used in many of the popular low spin designs, and the first Ventus profile features an ultra-stiff tip section. Fuji bills it as mid-launch with low spin.
We’ll dig into the construction in more detail in a future review, but the short version of the story is that Fujikura’s research with its in-house ENSO system is starting to return dividends. The company says the Ventus keeps the head more stable on off-center hits, while the accelerated taper enhances loading and feel.
Fuji says that Ventus works as an MOI booster of sorts that helps preserve ball speed by better resisting twisting when you miss the center of the face. The benefit is tighter dispersion, lower spin, and more ball speed.
It’s true that shaft claims are often dubious at best, but in my fitting, Ventus lived up to the promises and then some.
Correction: The original text of this section noted that Pitch 70 is 150% stronger than T1100. We have updated the text to reflect that the material is stiffer than T1100, but is not stronger.
The Return of Bridgestone Ball Fitting
While I’m sure Bridgestone would love us to talk about the new E12 or how Tiger played Bridgestone balls for nearly the duration of his Nike deal, the biggest Bridgestone story coming out of the show is the return of ball fitting.
Once upon a time, Bridgestone was the leader in consumer ball fittings, but as part of a string of questionable moves by former CEO Angel Ilagan, ball fitting – arguably Bridgestone’s biggest point of differentiation in the market – fell to the wayside.
Re-launched at the PGA Show, Bridgestone ball fitting isn’t just back; it’s improved in ways that make sense. In its previous incarnation, ball fitting was driver only. The updated process brings both irons and scoring clubs into play.
The timing couldn’t be better. Riding a string of recent PGA Tour victories and the success of the TIGER ball (Tour B XS), the return of ball fitting has plenty of upside for both the golfer and the Bridgestone Golf brand.
Titleist Pro V1 in Optic Yellow
Perhaps it’s a little too on the nose picking a new version of the #1 Ball in Golf™ as one of the impact products from the PGA Show, but it’s basically a given that the Pro V1 is going to get the lion’s share of tour play and is going to do well at retail as well. I’m not going to be wrong. The curiosity here is whether a yellow Pro V1 boosts interest in yellow across the entire market.
There’s still plenty of monkey see, monkey do when it comes to the average golfer taking cues from the Tour. It’s why approximately 80% of golf balls sold are still white. Could that change just a little?
Bubba put a yellow Pro V1x in play at the Waste Management, and if things fall into place for Titleist, maybe a couple find their way into play every week. Will that help Titleist’s bottom line while pushing sales of non-white golf balls beyond the 20% mark across the entire industry?
It’s worth a mention that Bridgestone is also set to release a yellow version of the Tour B XS and has its fingers crossed that Tiger will put it into play at the Masters Par 3 contest. Should that happen, there’s an even bigger chance this yellow thing gains some real momentum in 2019.
TPT Iron Shafts
TPT didn’t have a booth at the show, but those who knew where to look got a sneak peek at what the company hopes will serve to validate and differentiate its shaft technology moving forward.
We’ve covered both the good and bad of TPT’s sudden emergence as a serious player in the shaft game. The company tells us that the breakage issues are resolved and two new driver shafts (including the one Bryson has been playing) are coming this spring. That’s all well and good, but what I think has the potential to shake things up is its forthcoming line of graphite iron shafts (95 and 120-gram models).
Here’s the reality. Despite there being a number of solid, tour spec’d graphite offerings on the market for the last several years, no brand has been able to crack through the PGA Tour’s steel barrier. Kuchar with his SteelFibers was as close as it got, but with a convention defier like Bryson DeChambeau already playing a TPT driver shaft, the upstart Swiss company has a legitimate shot at succeeding where every other graphite iron shaft company has failed. The serious golfer hasn’t bought into to graphite largely because the best golfers in the world haven’t bought into graphite.
Might we see the start of a long slow shift this year? It’s doubtful, but I want to believe it could happen.
Realistically, the price point of the shafts will put TPT out of reach of the average golfer, but it’s the potential trickle-down effect of graphite iron shafts on Tour that intrigues me. Tour use would likely shatter the stigma around graphite iron shafts for better or at least higher swing speed players. If that happens, it’s going to break the consumer market open for the likes of UST (Recoil), Fujikura (MCI, Pro, Vista Pro), and True Temper (Catalyst).
Single Rider Carts
At some point, something is going to replace the conventional golf cart. As much as the purists would prefer everybody walk, the logical progression is towards a single rider cart. Yes, I know it’s already kind of a thing in Europe.
On our side of the pond, in one form or another, companies have been taking their shot at owning the yet to emerge space for the better part of the last decade.
Two-wheel skateboard style carts can be fun, but they’re not for everyone (people crash them). Motorcycle-styled designs were the rage at the PGA Show, but even if we overlook the fact that a kickstand will likely never be viable on a golf cart, the potential to destroy courses and ruin white pants is a legitimate concern. The design that goes mainstream will almost certainly have four wheels, and while our staff is partial to Elwee’s offering, what ultimately catches on will probably look a whole lot like a smaller version of today’s standard golf carts.
Allow me to quote myself: “This is golf, where more often than not, the next big thing is just a fresh take on the same old thing.”
The single rider future is not imminent; it’s going to take some effort for single rider carts to replace what we already have. Economically viability for most golf courses dictates that two single rider carts can’t cost much more than a single two rider cart. Two small carts will take up more space than regular one, so cart barn space could be an issue in some cases, as could the electrical requirements.
The promised upside to the single rider cart that breaks through is improved pace of play, potentially more golfers on the course, and more time to spend in the restaurant after the round.
Lynx Prowler VT Driver
I know, throwing Lynx on this list is a little odd. So, let me be clear. I have no expectation that Lynx is going to take over the driver market with its Prowler VT Driver with SwitchFace technology, but I love that a small brand is taking a chance on adjustability in a way that’s different.
Look, I had doubts when TaylorMade decided to stick a pair of screws in its M5 and M6 drivers, so it should come as no surprise that I have even bigger concerns about Lynx relying on three additional screws to keep the face attached to the head.
I wish them luck.
Still, it borders on remarkable that Lynx has generated some small amount of buzz and the design is sure to get mainstream OEMs thinking about what else might be possible. Ultimately, the Prowler VT Driver could prove to be one of those obscure but indelible footnotes that live on in golfers’ memories.
A decade or two from now when a mainstream OEM takes a crack at swapping faces, somebody is going to remember that Lynx did it first…before someone else points out that DnA Golf did it before Lynx.
GIVEAWAY: The “Best Value” Rangefinder 2018!
Precision Pro NX7 PRO
Enter MyGolfSpy’s Giveaway!
Titleist CNCPT Irons
I’m not sure how much we’re supposed to be talking about the new CNPT irons, but the photos are out, there are rumors of massive yardage gains, and most of the golf interwebs knows they’re coming.
The 2019 CNCPT line will feature two models, both of which will be produced in limited quantities, and both are going to cost you significantly more than a typical set of irons. When it comes to the ultra-premium market, PXG has nothing on Titleist.
So why am I talking about it? The next Titleist iron will feature a new face material along with a massive amount of a more conventional material integrated into the design. In that respect, the new CNCPT iron will live up to its name. It’s a true Concept product, the kind of club everyone in the industry would love to make if actually having to sell it wasn’t a concern.
What makes CNCPT cool for the rest of us is that innovation almost invariably flows downhill, so while it might take a few years, it’s likely only a matter of time before what Titleist has done with CNCPT trickles down into mainstream products that most golfers can actually afford.
Odyssey Stroke Lab Putter Shafts
It’s too soon to say if the shift is driven by innovation or just opportunity, but there are plenty of signs that suggest that the putter shaft is about to get a mainstream upgrade.
Last year BGT released its Stability Shaft, and while I’ve become a believer, it’s Odyssey’s Stroke Lab Shaft that’s poised to have the biggest market impact. While both shafts promise increased consistency, Odyssey’s Tempo Enhancing Design makes similar stability promises without the extra weight that comes with the BGT offering.
Of course, if weight proves to be the thing that matters, BGT has a better chance, so does the new KBS C-Taper putter shaft that comes standard in TaylorMade’s new Spider X.
Given Odyssey’s market position, however, and that fact that it’s going all-in with Stroke Lab in 2019, it’s a virtual certainty that somebody you know will have a multi-material putter shaft in the bag this season.
Bushnell Pro XE Rangefinder
Let’s wrap this up with the kind of product you’d expect to find any on any best of PGA Show list.
Significantly undercut on price by upstarts like Precision Pro and Tec Tec Tec, it stands to reason that Bushnell, the industry leader in the golf rangefinder category, might be feeling increasing pressure to justify asking consumers to spend a few hundred bucks more on its products.
At $549, the Pro XE doesn’t sacrifice Bushnell’s premium price position in the market, but that extra cash will get you a robust selection of standard and new features.
The most compelling feature of the Pro XE is Bushnell’s new Slope Algorithm. Instead of relying on simple geometry to calculate a Play As distance, Bushnell’s new flagship model collects temperature and altitude data (it sounds like an onboard barometric pressure sensor) and integrates them into its ball flight calculations to make that Play As distance significantly more accurate.
Granted, the feature isn’t exactly tournament legal but most of us won’t care, and for those who do, with a simple flip of a switch, you can make the Pro XE 100% conforming.
If that weren’t enough, the Pro XE features a built-in BITE Magnetic Mount which lets you stick it to the side of a cart with no additional hardware required. Bushnell has also updated its Jolt Technology to provide even more feedback and by extension, confidence when locking on to targets.
A carry case is also included.
Have Your Say
What did we miss? What new products do you think will have the biggest impact on the golf equipment market?